Fieldwork in the Atacama Desert, Chile

Wednesday 23 August 2017

3 Days, 3 Rock Types and 100 Million Years: Climbing in Devon

This (extended) weekend just gone, Dan, one of our regular ex-Norwich climbing partners, took us on a climbing tour of his home crags in Devon. This was an excuse for me to look at some nice rocks and we managed to get on three different rock types, covering over 100 million years of the geological history of the UK, over the three days.

Simplified geological map of Devon showing the three locations (adapted from Kirkwood et al., 2016)


Day 1: Baggy Point - Sandstone

Saturday, starting off at Baggy Point near Croyde. The climbing here is on the 360-370 million year old, Upper Devonian Baggy Sandstone Formation. They overlie the Upcott Slates and are themselves overlain by the Pilton Mudstones, all together a making up a 450m thick succession of interbedded sands, silts, muds and thin limestones charting a changing river delta succession which at first built outwards as sea level fell and then retreated inland as sea level rose again.

Due to their age and the pressures and temperatures they have been subjected to these sandstones are slightly metamorphosed and so are much harder than more recent sandstone deposits (such as those known to climbers as the Southern Sandstones around Kent) and so are a lot more solid to climb on. Routes (such as the classics Lost Horizon and Shangri-Lai) follow angular fractured cracks up otherwise sheer faces while harder routes tackle the blank slabs themselves, relying on delicate footwork and careful movement with little means of protection.

Rob leading Lost Horizon following a steep crack system

The sheer faces plunging steeply into the sea that characterise the climbing here were originally horizontal as the sedimentary sequence was deposited on the sea bed. However, during the Late Devonian and Carboniferous Periods these rocks felt the distal effects of the mountain building event known as the Variscan Orogeny. The continents of Gondwana and Laurussia collided to form the supercontinent Pangea highly folding and faulting the rocks as they were compressed together. At Baggy Point this tilted the sequence very steeply to bring the ancient sea bed to a near vertical orientation and creating the sheer, almost featureless, delicate slabs which are a feature of the climbing here.

Dan leading while I belay on the second pitch of a route up one of the steeply dipping slabs at Baggy Point (credit: C. Wade)

Unfortunately due to the interbedded weaker muds and the highly erosive sea cliff environment a lot of the rock here is quite fragile and we pulled a few dangerous chunks off into the sea as we climbed.

Day 2: Daddyhole - Limestone

Sunday, now we’re climbing a little further back in time to the mid-Devonian at the cliffs of Daddyhole in Torquay. This is very close to the Devonian type section at Torbay (which I have written about before as part of the UEA Slapton fieldtrip). The plan was to climb on the lower part of the sequence at Daddyhole Main Cliff, however, due to the long commiting nature of the routes down there and the incoming rain we were forced to visit the uppermost part of the sequence instead at Daddyhole Upper.

The mid-Devonian Limestones here were deposited around 400 million years ago when the UK was located within the tropics and Devon was beneath a warm, shallow, tropical sea. The limestones here represent a sequence from a thriving offshore reef system, well away from any polluting terrestrial input, with corals, sponges, shellfish and other organisms being highly abundant in the fossil record. Overtime (up the sequence/cliff face) the limestone becomes ‘dirtier’ as more sand and mud reaches the area from the nearby landmass and the reef life is gradually choked out, a process helped by nearby volcanoes occasionally burying the reef in ash deposits.

Spot the Dan, he's pretty much at the boundary between the cleaner massively bedded limestones and the siltier, finer bedded sequence above

The impurity of the limestone and interbedded siltier layers mean that the climbing at Daddyhole Upper is somewhat ‘esoteric’ with plenty of loose, crumbly rock and so it is not the most popular venue. This does however mean it has not taken on the smooth mirror-polished quality of more popular limestone crags (such as much of the climbing in Portland or Cheddar) and the combination of weathered out juggy limestone cracks and grippy rock is a rare delight (as long as you don’t think about how sketchy all the gear placements are. Unfortunately rain quickly stopped play here and we only got a single route in before retreating for a seaside Devonshire cream tea.

Charlotte's favourite type of climbing


Day 3: Dartmoor - Granite

Monday and its back to the future on the granite of Dartmoor. This is part of the massive Cornubian Batholith (batholith = large body of magma) that welled up underneath the southwest of England around 300-275 million years ago, during the Late Carboniferous-Early Permian. This outcrops at various localities all the way from the Isles of Scilly to Dartmoor, but is known (from a low density gravity anomaly) to extend more than 100 km further southwest under the sea.

The formation of this huge body of molten rock is related to the same mountain building event as the folding of the Devonian sediments (that we climbed on the previous two days) it intruded into. Partial melting of the lower crust occurred at a late stage during the mountain building process (after the majority of the folding had already occurred) and extension of the crust allowed the batholith to rise irregularly as ‘blobs’ to higher levels.

Over time, the softer sedimentary rocks that were intruded into have preferentially eroded away, leaving behind these granite ‘blobs’ exposed as Tors on areas such as Dartmoor. As the overlying rocks were removed the granite was unloaded and expanded, fracturing both horizontally and vertically and peeling itself apart. This produced the horizontal breaks, vertical cracks and juggy flake systems that characterise climbing on the Tors of Dartmoor.

Dan wedging himself in a nice big crack, note the horizontal joints too (credit C. Wade)

Large, sharp phenocrysts (big crystals) of plagioclase stand out proud from the otherwise surprisingly smooth and slippery blank sections of granite face. These tell the geologist that the granite cooled in stages, the big crystals grew slowly at depth before the magma rose upwards to shallower, cooler levels and finished solidifying quicker so the rest of the crystals (the groundmass) are much smaller. For the climber, delicate, precise footwork or desperate crimping and hauling with the fingertips on these small protrusions is often the only way to make progress on the harder routes. The sharpness of these crystals tears into the skin restricting the number of attempts you can have at a hard move before bloody fingers stop play, but gives excellent friction allowing your climbing shoes to stick to the smallest nubbin.

Me climbing Vandal & Ann, run out and sketched out trying to figure out the best way of using a series of crappy little crystals to get to the safety of the next big break (credit C. Wade)

Clearly in three days it is only possible to scratch the surface of the number of different rock types and climbing venues available in the southwest and we will return soon to sample more of their esoteric delights. Although it’s back onto my favourite Peak Grit for the upcoming bank holiday weekend.

Sunday 6 August 2017

Mars Sample Return

This week I’ve been at a NASA and National Science Academies hosted planetary protection workshop in Washington DC, representing the European Science Foundation and the Planetary Protection of the Outer Solar system  (PPOSS) team (everyone important was busy/on holiday). The workshop was focused on planetary protection for the Mars 2020 mission which has an extra element of complication as it is a sample return mission – well, the 2020 mission is actually a sample caching mission, they haven’t quite figured out when and how the collected samples will be returned by a future mission….

Mars 2020 Rover (nature.com)


Sample return is a double problem for planetary protection as we have to worry about both forward and backward contamination. Forward contamination is an issue for all life detection missions, this is when the spacecraft is contaminated by hitchhiking microorganisms and organic molecules which could confound the results of the scientific experiments. This may lead us to believe we’ve found life on Mars (or wherever we’re visiting) in what is known as a false positive, or, signals from contaminants could swamp the instruments so that we miss small crucial signals of extraterrestrial life, or prebiotic organic molecules (the building blocks of life) – a false negative. Backward contamination is the worry that a sample return mission may bring back dangerous microorganisms or other infective agents such as viruses or prions (what is a prion?). This is only a concern for sample return missions that bring back material from localities which are potentially habitable, including certain areas of Mars which may have just enough water to host microbial life under the surface where it would be protected from the deadly radiation on the surface (which is why both Mars 2020 and ExoMars will have drills for subsurface sampling).

The likelihood of a sample return mission bringing back something dangerous is incredibly low, we currently have no evidence of life on Mars (whatever the conspiracy nutjobs claim). It is unlikely that Martian life would be compatible with, and therefore able to infect pathogenically, Earth life as it would have either evolved completely independently or had billions of years since a last common ancestor. However, despite the low chances, NASA (amongst others) is still taking this risk very seriously as the consequences of a Martian pathogen could be catastrophic (think Andromeda Strain) as no life on Earth would have antibiotic resistance to it.



Because of this, a large proportion of this meeting was given over to US governmental policy makers to discuss how the spread of invasive species are stopped, how disease outbreaks are dealt with and current biosafety and biosecurity policies and procedures. The overall take home message from this is that even though there is a lack of data and low chance of anything dangerous happening, the public will be very concerned about back contamination and it is public opinion which will force policy change rather than the science. Because of this we need to get the public interested and on side, through risk communication and societal participation – such as citizen science type projects (as SETI have done in their search for extraterrestrial signals) – to combat scaremongering groups early on (there is already a committee against Mars Sample Return although they appear to be currently inactive). It was also made clear that we need an international input as consequences, however unlikely, would be global.

Lessons for preventing backward contamination from Mars Sample Return can be taken from looking back at how it was dealt with for Apollo 11, the first mission to bring lunar samples back. As we knew so little about the moon at that point the astronauts were immediately quarantined on return and the samples were tested for infectious or toxic agents by exposing a wide variety of plants and animals to them before they could be released to labs around the world and the astronauts could be let out (obviously there was nothing living in the samples as we now know that the moon is a very inhospitable place).

Crew of Apollo 11 in quarantine (NASA)


Other than this it was interesting to hear a recurring point, by the presenting scientists, on the Podium principle which was just how much evidence you need to have gathered to be able to stand up and say ‘Yes, we’ve found life’. The answer, it seems, is a lot, much more than anyone has found so far. This principle has not always been followed quite extensively enough. In the ‘70s, proof for life on Mars was claimed (and still is to this day by the lead author) after life detection experiments carried out by the Viking lander seemed to show an active metabolism in the Martian soil with nutrients being consumed and carbon dioxide given off when warmth, water and food were provided. However, the results of this experiment can be explained more simply by the presence of reactive oxidising minerals in the soil (such as the perchlorates I work on) which we know are definitely there from other analyses carried out. In the ‘90s structures in the Alan Hills meteorite were claimed to be fossilised Martian bacteria, although these were later shown to be abiotic (non-life) mineral structures the study of this meteorite really kicked off the field of astrobiology as interest in finding alien life was dragged into mainstream science.

Structures in the Allan Hills meteorite suggested to be fossil bacteria (NASA)


Outside of the meeting I had to go visit the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum to go and look at relics of the Apollo space missions which collected all of the lunar samples that I have been working on. Putting the work I do into context with the amount of effort that went into getting these samples was quite humbling although it was odd to see people queuing up to touch a tiny polished piece of moon rock when I’ve destroyed a fair amount of this priceless material. And of course I couldn’t miss a chance to get a selfie with a life size model of Curiosity!




Unfortunately the trip hasn’t gone completely smoothly as I’m writing this whilst stuck in Detroit airport where I spent last night sleeping (well attempting to) under a bench after I missed my connecting flight home to London thanks to storms delaying my flight leaving DC. So I’ll be spending 17 hours in Detroit airport before flying over to Boston to connect to Heathrow and getting home a day later than planned – fun times.